From owner-cvs-all Sun Jan 10 12:22:17 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id MAA09450 for cvs-all-outgoing; Sun, 10 Jan 1999 12:22:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (zippy.cdrom.com [204.216.27.228]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA09443 for ; Sun, 10 Jan 1999 12:22:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com) Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by zippy.cdrom.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id MAA53008; Sun, 10 Jan 1999 12:17:39 -0800 (PST) To: Poul-Henning Kamp cc: sthaug@nethelp.no, des@flood.ping.uio.no, darrenr@reed.wattle.id.au, committers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: sysctl descriptions In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 10 Jan 1999 17:42:51 +0100." <20680.915986571@critter.freebsd.dk> Date: Sun, 10 Jan 1999 12:17:39 -0800 Message-ID: <53005.915999459@zippy.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk > No, I don't want to push it to a -core vote, I merely used our CVS > convention to indicate where DES could take this as the next step > if he wanted to be (more) confrontational. Well, it sounds like that's what we've got anyway. Since we don't have another mechanism for this yet, it's time to call for a core vote on it or deal with another several days' worth of bickering. Myself, I'll take the vote. - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message