From owner-svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Fri May 20 23:34:48 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E98F0B4408D; Fri, 20 May 2016 23:34:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com) Received: from shell1.rawbw.com (shell1.rawbw.com [198.144.192.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8ED8D1829; Fri, 20 May 2016 23:34:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com) Received: from yuri.doctorlan.com (c-24-5-143-190.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [24.5.143.190]) (authenticated bits=0) by shell1.rawbw.com (8.15.1/8.15.1) with ESMTPSA id u4KNYc06079123 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 20 May 2016 16:34:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com) X-Authentication-Warning: shell1.rawbw.com: Host c-24-5-143-190.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [24.5.143.190] claimed to be yuri.doctorlan.com Subject: Re: svn commit: r415574 - in head/graphics: . aseprite aseprite/files To: Mathieu Arnold , Kurt Jaeger , ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.org, svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.org References: <201605201915.u4KJFN7i018668@repo.freebsd.org> <632FB3BA205C95E9CACA0976@atuin.in.mat.cc> From: Yuri Message-ID: <2b4a3431-78b2-5ec7-69ab-fff43a7bc71b@rawbw.com> Date: Fri, 20 May 2016 16:34:37 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <632FB3BA205C95E9CACA0976@atuin.in.mat.cc> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 May 2016 23:34:49 -0000 On 05/20/2016 12:32, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > Why not use options helpers instead of including bsd.port.options.mk ? > > | +.include > > Why is bsd.port.pre.mk needed ? Thanks for noticing this. Corrected: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209676 Yuri