Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 14 Jul 2003 19:17:37 -0300
From:      Patrick Tracanelli <eksffa@freebsdbrasil.com.br>
To:        freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: [luigi@FreeBSD.org: cvs commit: src/sbin/ipfw ipfw2.c]
Message-ID:  <3F132C01.4010306@freebsdbrasil.com.br>
In-Reply-To: <20030712002222.A78447@xorpc.icir.org>
References:  <20030712002222.A78447@xorpc.icir.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

>
> * implement comments in ipfw commands. These are implemented in the
>   kernel as O_NOP commands (which always match) whose body contains
>   the comment string. In userland, a comment is a C++-style comment
>   appended to the rule:
>
>     ipfw add allow ip from me to any // i can talk to everybody
>
> cheers
> luigi

Got a funny behaviour here; keep-state option is displayed after 
comment, see:

ipfw 200 add count tcp from any to any out xmit ath0 setup keep-state // 
comment

00200 count tcp from any to any out xmit ath0 setup // comment keep-state

ipfw sh 200

00200   47   5537 count tcp from any to any out xmit ath0 setup // 
comment keep-state

But still works:

## Dynamic rules (1):
00200   10    472 (0s) STATE tcp 200.210.42.5 49653 <-> 200.210.70.4 25

Just a display misbehaviour;

-- 
Atenciosamente,

Patrick Tracanelli
patrick @ freebsdbrasil.com.br
"Long live Hanin Elias, Kim Deal!"



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3F132C01.4010306>