From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 1 20:30:21 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDF2B16A401 for ; Thu, 1 Feb 2007 20:30:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kip.macy@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.169]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71A6F13C461 for ; Thu, 1 Feb 2007 20:30:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kip.macy@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o2so559808uge for ; Thu, 01 Feb 2007 12:30:17 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=C8cxn/LJ8fCVVyjK33xZSewieg6qFCxeIvTyZoWn/lNrxW9ggR4kujLnP9NKypOO0iRKGtX9yE2+3Rg+ajGs8TSqBMbm7CJg3C0vhkibZo8XeGHSrgtXHhrMrmlxRfSJwDBTYpZ3wPBsvVP4VGT723QzDEHguALtGDMBc7tOaAo= Received: by 10.82.183.19 with SMTP id g19mr794213buf.1170361816832; Thu, 01 Feb 2007 12:30:16 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.191.16 with HTTP; Thu, 1 Feb 2007 12:30:16 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2007 12:30:16 -0800 From: "Kip Macy" To: "Julian Elischer" , "Ivan Voras" , freebsd-current@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <45C24788.2040708@elischer.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <45C24113.7000608@elischer.org> <45C24788.2040708@elischer.org> Cc: Subject: Re: lock contention etc. X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2007 20:30:21 -0000 I can already tell you from builds on the T2000 that its the vm page queue mutex. On 2/1/07, Julian Elischer wrote: > Ivan Voras wrote: > > Julian Elischer wrote: > > > >> 3762.94 real 2627.66 user 1275.78 sys > >> 2465.10 real 2958.94 user 1918.64 sys > >> 2262.88 real 4322.31 user 3333.58 sys > > > >> (2 processors with HTT) (looks like 4 processors) > >> -current, sched_4bsd > > > > I'm possibly stating the obvious, but did you try without HTT or on a > > real 4proc machine? Much of the contention might be an artifact of HTT > > (e.g. HTT "logical" processor blocking when real work could be done > > because the internal processor units are busy elsewhere). > > > > > > yes I just sent an email stating that. > And I'm trying it again with the virtual cores turned off. > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >