From owner-freebsd-security Sun Sep 3 14:31:39 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from jade.chc-chimes.com (jade.chc-chimes.com [216.28.46.6]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CF6937B422; Sun, 3 Sep 2000 14:31:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by jade.chc-chimes.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 9A4F21C41; Sun, 3 Sep 2000 17:31:36 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2000 17:31:36 -0400 From: Bill Fumerola To: Darren Reed Cc: Robert Watson , Dragos Ruiu , cjclark@alum.mit.edu, "Crist J . Clark" , Nicolas , freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ipfw and fragments Message-ID: <20000903173136.S33771@jade.chc-chimes.com> References: <200009032010.HAA15013@cairo.anu.edu.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: <200009032010.HAA15013@cairo.anu.edu.au>; from avalon@coombs.anu.edu.au on Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 07:10:46AM +1100 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 3.3-STABLE i386 Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 07:10:46AM +1100, Darren Reed wrote: > It never reassembles and doesn't hold them in a buffer until they're > all received either. Which I still think is the proper behavior for both ipfw and ipfilter. -- Bill Fumerola - Network Architect, BOFH / Chimes, Inc. billf@chimesnet.com / billf@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message