From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 3 10:26:43 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AA7D5B2 for ; Tue, 3 Sep 2013 10:26:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lev@FreeBSD.org) Received: from onlyone.friendlyhosting.spb.ru (onlyone.friendlyhosting.spb.ru [46.4.40.135]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBF2C21E4 for ; Tue, 3 Sep 2013 10:26:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lion.home.serebryakov.spb.ru (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:923f:1:61fd:95c3:8111:539a]) (Authenticated sender: lev@serebryakov.spb.ru) by onlyone.friendlyhosting.spb.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2D2F74AC2D; Tue, 3 Sep 2013 14:26:40 +0400 (MSK) Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2013 14:26:37 +0400 From: Lev Serebryakov X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <998724759.20130903142637@serebryakov.spb.ru> To: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= Subject: Re: OpenSSH, PAM and kerberos In-Reply-To: <86ppsqutw7.fsf@nine.des.no> References: <86d2ovy64p.fsf@nine.des.no> <20130830100926.GU3796@zxy.spb.ru> <20130830103009.GV3796@zxy.spb.ru> <86sixrwdcv.fsf@nine.des.no> <20130830131455.GW3796@zxy.spb.ru> <8661uj9lc6.fsf@nine.des.no> <20130902181754.GD3796@zxy.spb.ru> <867geywdfc.fsf@nine.des.no> <20130903083301.GF3796@zxy.spb.ru> <86y57euu8y.fsf@nine.des.no> <20130903093756.GG3796@zxy.spb.ru> <86ppsqutw7.fsf@nine.des.no> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.org, Slawa Olhovchenkov X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Security issues \[members-only posting\]" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2013 10:26:43 -0000 Hello, Dag-Erling. You wrote 3 =D1=81=D0=B5=D0=BD=D1=82=D1=8F=D0=B1=D1=80=D1=8F 2013 =D0=B3., = 13:38:48: >> And how in this case can be resolved situation with PAM credentials >> (Kerberos credentials in may case)? DES> The application does not need them. They are written to disk with pam_open_session() and this call should be called by sshd, not some "authorization daemon", if I understand situation right. Or don't I? --=20 // Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov