From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 14 22:48:08 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 937F216A4CE for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2005 22:48:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from anuket.mj.niksun.com (gwnew.niksun.com [65.115.46.162]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C325143D1D for ; Mon, 14 Mar 2005 22:48:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jkim@niksun.com) Received: from [10.70.0.244] (daemon.mj.niksun.com [10.70.0.244]) by anuket.mj.niksun.com (8.13.1/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j2EMm4WY024634; Mon, 14 Mar 2005 17:48:05 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jkim@niksun.com) From: Jung-uk Kim Organization: Niksun, Inc. To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 17:47:57 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <4235E6CC.7040909@santaba.com> In-Reply-To: <4235E6CC.7040909@santaba.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200503141747.57487.jkim@niksun.com> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.83/762/Sun Mar 13 18:35:33 2005 on anuket.mj.niksun.com X-Virus-Status: Clean cc: Jeff Subject: Re: IPMI doesn't work... X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 22:48:08 -0000 On Monday 14 March 2005 02:32 pm, Jeff wrote: > it worth posting to -net> > > on a 5.3 amd64 system. anyone have any luck or know anything about > this? i can query variables right up until the point where the > kernel loads, then nothing. ibm is saying this can be caused by > the actual nic driver (the Baseboard Management Controller (BMC) > shares the network interface); the system uses a Broadcom BCM5704C > Dual gig adapter: > > bge0: > mem 0xfe000000-0xfe00ffff,0xfe010000-0xfe01ffff irq 24 at device > 1.0 on pci2 Does 'in-band' mode work for you? Try FreeIPMI to check: http://www.gnu.org/software/freeipmi/ http://www.freshports.org/sysutils/freeipmi/ > anyone have any idea why this may be the case? unfortunately for > me and others here, the inability to remotely manage boxes > (console/power cycle/detect drive failures/etc) via ipmi will be a > deal breaker in our push for FBSD in our fleet (couple hundred) of > dual proc amd64 IBM e325 servers. SuSE here we come > (unwillingly)... BTW, SuSE won't work for you: http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/abstracts/tips0532.html Jung-uk Kim > thx