From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Jun  4 08:48:40 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B80F3106564A;
	Mon,  4 Jun 2012 08:48:40 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from dave@jetcafe.org)
Received: from hugeraid.jetcafe.org (hugeraid.jetcafe.org [205.147.26.109])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96FBD8FC14;
	Mon,  4 Jun 2012 08:48:40 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from hugeraid.jetcafe.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by hugeraid.jetcafe.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q548fVHa091169;
	Mon, 4 Jun 2012 01:41:31 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <201206040841.q548fVHa091169@hugeraid.jetcafe.org>
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.7.2 01/07/2005 with nmh-1.0.4
To: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>
In-reply-to: <20120604043233.GB32597@lonesome.com> 
References: <CAOgwaMvsv3e1TxDauV038Pp7LRiYeH7oAODE+w-pxHt9oGrXMA@mail.gmail.com>
	<201206020012.q520CEcf057568@hugeraid.jetcafe.org>
	<20120602004230.GA14487@in-addr.com>
	<201206040224.q542OBqk085897@hugeraid.jetcafe.org>
	<20120604043233.GB32597@lonesome.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2012 01:41:31 -0700
From: Dave Hayes <dave@jetcafe.org>
Cc: freebsd-stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: Why Are You NOT Using FreeBSD ? 
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2012 08:48:40 -0000

Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> writes:
> On Sun, Jun 03, 2012 at 07:24:11PM -0700, Dave Hayes wrote:
>> I see features and pkgng and things being offered up as solutions...
>> these are all well and good, but in my opinion more comprehensive
>> documentation and support in these areas would do more good than pkgng.
> IMHO pkgng and optionsng are necessary, but not sufficient, to solve
> our current problems.

Optionsng is nice, but lacking in documentation. Is it too much to ask
port maintainers to write a bit more documentation on the options they
are providing? 
-- 
Dave Hayes - Consultant - Altadena CA, USA - dave@jetcafe.org 
>>> The opinions expressed above are entirely my own <<<

Sunshine proves it's own existence.