From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 16 04:18:33 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5401916A4CE for ; Sat, 16 Oct 2004 04:18:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from www.cotse.net (packetderm.com [68.166.125.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11ECA43D2F for ; Sat, 16 Oct 2004 04:18:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from miker@cotse.com) Received: from localhost (localhost[127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by www.cotse.net (5.7.4/5.7.4) with ESMTP id i9G4INIq016955 for ; Sat, 16 Oct 2004 00:18:24 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from miker@cotse.com) From: Michael Ray To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2004 23:18:23 -0500 Organization: Cotse Message-ID: References: <41701194.5010107@ng.fadesa.es> In-Reply-To: <41701194.5010107@ng.fadesa.es> X-Mailer: Forte Agent 2.0/32.652 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: FreeBSD 5.3b7and poor ata performance X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: miker@cotse.com List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2004 04:18:33 -0000 On Fri, 15 Oct 2004 20:06:12 +0200, you wrote: >Hello, > > This is an interesting issue. While I was installing FreeBSD 5.3b7 >I wonder about the performance that the new branch will bring to my >computer, and it was a deception how bad FreeBSD performs compared >with Linux on the same hardware (even I repeat the test on different PC >with identical results). Was this a GENERIC or custom kernel? Did you cvsup and buildworld, etc or was it a base install from the beta7 cd? Can you post your kernel config if it isn't GENERIC? Mike