From owner-cvs-sbin Mon Feb 2 07:43:31 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from daemon@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id HAA16174 for cvs-sbin-outgoing; Mon, 2 Feb 1998 07:43:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-cvs-sbin) Received: from Kitten.mcs.com (Kitten.mcs.com [192.160.127.90]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id HAA15989; Mon, 2 Feb 1998 07:42:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nash@Jupiter.Mcs.Net) Received: from Jupiter.Mcs.Net (nash@Jupiter.mcs.net [192.160.127.88]) by Kitten.mcs.com (8.8.7/8.8.2) with ESMTP id JAA10453; Mon, 2 Feb 1998 09:42:09 -0600 (CST) Received: from localhost (nash@localhost) by Jupiter.Mcs.Net (8.8.7/8.8.2) with SMTP id JAA17715; Mon, 2 Feb 1998 09:42:08 -0600 (CST) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 1998 09:42:08 -0600 (CST) From: Alex Nash To: "Daniel O'Callaghan" cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-sbin@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sbin/ipfw ipfw.8 ipfw.c In-Reply-To: <199802021148.DAA04983@freefall.freebsd.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-cvs-sbin@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Mon, 2 Feb 1998, Daniel O'Callaghan wrote: > danny 1998/02/02 03:48:06 PST > > Modified files: (Branch: RELENG_2_2) > sbin/ipfw ipfw.8 ipfw.c > Log: > Reviewed by: Archie Cobbs > Submitted by: Alex Le Heux > Add '-n' option to suppress command action. > > Revision Changes Path > 1.23.2.10 +7 -1 src/sbin/ipfw/ipfw.8 > 1.34.2.11 +167 -93 src/sbin/ipfw/ipfw.c ^^^^^^^^ IIRC, this is considerably more than what was submitted :) Also, do we really want to put such large changes into the 2.2 branch without any testing in -current? Alex