From owner-freebsd-current  Thu May  1 07:44:44 1997
Return-Path: <owner-current>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id HAA27782
          for current-outgoing; Thu, 1 May 1997 07:44:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bach.ca.sandia.gov (bach.ca.sandia.gov [146.246.245.201])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id HAA27777
          for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Thu, 1 May 1997 07:44:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bach.ca.sandia.gov (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by bach.ca.sandia.gov (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id HAA16684;
	Thu, 1 May 1997 07:44:04 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199705011444.HAA16684@bach.ca.sandia.gov>
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0gamma+ 1/27/96
To: proff@suburbia.net
Cc: syssgm@dtir.qld.gov.au (Stephen McKay), louie@TransSys.COM,
        freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: latest -current upgrade and CFS 
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 01 May 1997 22:46:30 +1000."
             <19970501124630.11023.qmail@suburbia.net> 
From: bmah@CA.Sandia.GOV (Bruce A. Mah)
Reply-To: bmah@CA.Sandia.GOV
X-Face: g~c`.{#4q0"(V*b#g[i~rXgm*w;:nMfz%_RZLma)UgGN&=j`5vXoU^@n5<Pi&akO)o^8;[r
 %l(8ZHlbF`dD>v4:OO)c["!w)nD/!!~e4Sj7LiT'6*wZ83454H""lb{CC%T37O!!'S$S&D}sem7I[A
 2V%N&+
X-Url: http://www.ca.sandia.gov/~bmah/
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_593979645P";
	micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Thu, 01 May 1997 07:44:04 -0700
Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

--==_Exmh_593979645P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

proff@suburbia.net writes:
> > "Louis A. Mamakos" <louie@TransSys.COM> wrote:

> > He could export it if he left out the underlying crypto bits.  Clever
> > non-US citizens could put new crypto bits in to make the non-US version.
> > Has anyone put this to him?  I don't know Matt's address to ask him.

> No. This is verboten as well. CFS is available at a number of ftp sites
> outside the us. http://ftpsearch.ntnu.no/ftpsearch

This is probably a stupid question, but it seems to me that if you take out 
all the crypto parts of CFS, all that's left is a framework that takes 
filesystem data, runs it through a transform, and makes it available to the 
filesystem at a different mountpoint.  Why is that forbidden?

(Slap me upside the head if this is straying too far from -current topics.)

Bruce.



--==_Exmh_593979645P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP MESSAGE-----
Version: 2.6.2

iQCVAwUBM2isMajOOi0j7CY9AQEdtgP/VH0ggEK2SqB9SV/gPqobB4188lFOVQur
o89FvWbxNsmALXBKADhlT38P28tmGeZ0FzWKK6bgYlQJNJu3jVmcNWpChzPnti/9
ymMFlp2PmcaGV+e7+79Srd+TdipGGAajEeyqqJV4JZ6JGTTSZSzsItn5nDmUq7j6
pP8QZHu/b2A=
=xlBJ
-----END PGP MESSAGE-----

--==_Exmh_593979645P--