From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 22 19:09:51 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E9AE123 for ; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 19:09:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 861333848 for ; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 19:09:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s7MJ9pD3081972 for ; Fri, 22 Aug 2014 19:09:51 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 192878] comms/pr [maintainer] new source location Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2014 19:09:51 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports Tree X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: portmaster@bsdforge.com X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2014 19:09:51 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192878 --- Comment #28 from C Hutchinson --- (In reply to John Marino from comment #27) > oh well? > > It means your system doesn't understand stage and it means this PR is 100% > untested. > > Grep "check-plist" in Mk/bsd.stage.mk, it is obviously a target, so that > fact that it doesn't recognize it is a big problem. Maybe not at the port > level, but the entire tree level. > > You don't have "NO_STAGE=yes" in your make.conf do you? Or anything else > that blocks it? > > How far away is your poudriere setup from coming online? why don't we just > wait until you can test it? My bsd.stage.mk indicates February 2014. Was check-plist created later? No I have nothing that could possibly interfere with porting in make, or src.conf. The box stages as one would anticipate. In fact, it _insists_ on it. I'll be building the 11 box, once I finish here. I hate leaving things unresolved. Too many "loose ends". I'll be rescuing _many_ ports, once I finish the new box (Saturday, or Sunday). That should prove a good enough "test bed". Don't you think? --Chris -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.