From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 9 15:58:53 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E46F16A4CE for ; Tue, 9 Nov 2004 15:58:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from fillmore.dyndns.org (port-212-202-50-234.dynamic.qsc.de [212.202.50.234]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E25CB43D1D for ; Tue, 9 Nov 2004 15:58:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com) Received: from dhcp-15.local ([172.16.0.15] helo=dhcp-12.local) by fillmore.dyndns.org with esmtps (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.43 (FreeBSD)) id 1CRYON-000Enm-7s; Tue, 09 Nov 2004 16:58:49 +0100 Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2004 16:59:51 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v482) To: Oliver Lehmann From: Oliver Eikemeier In-Reply-To: <20041107215254.41fcd839.lehmann@ans-netz.de> Message-Id: <63CB4594-3268-11D9-A7A8-00039312D914@fillmore-labs.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: KMail/1.5.9 cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: no cvs port? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2004 15:58:53 -0000 Oliver Lehmann wrote: > Michael Nottebrock wrote: > >> On Sunday, 7. November 2004 11:59, Oliver Lehmann wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I would like to make world my system without cvs, and install it from >>> ports instead. But... am I right that there is no cvs port? >> >> There is devel/cvs+ipv6 >> > > Hm ok, but then you have ipv6 with you. I've made a devel/cvs port, and > I'm on the way to commit it.... objections? any? You might want to have a look into It's a cvs port I've done a while ago, and it can use both the FreeBSD options extensions and the standard CVS 1.12 ones, which makes it comatible with a combined {Free,Net,Open,DragonFly}BSD repositories. The only thing that works, but I'm not happy with is template handling. Other than this, I managed to have it pass all included tests. The devel/cvs+ipv6 has the disadvantage that it can not handle the FreeBSD options extension, which makes it unsuitable for FreeBSD development work. -Oliver