From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 20 01:29:56 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7331C16A4CF for ; Sat, 20 Nov 2004 01:29:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from neo.redjade.org (neo.redjade.org [219.254.21.62]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2644943D4C for ; Sat, 20 Nov 2004 01:29:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ssw@neo.redjade.org) Received: from neo.redjade.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by neo.redjade.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id iAK1UHqi069278; Sat, 20 Nov 2004 10:30:17 +0900 (KST) (envelope-from ssw@neo.redjade.org) Received: (from ssw@localhost) by neo.redjade.org (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id iAK1UG08069277; Sat, 20 Nov 2004 10:30:16 +0900 (KST) (envelope-from ssw) Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2004 10:30:16 +0900 From: Sangwoo Shim To: Chuck Swiger Message-ID: <20041120013016.GA69112@neo.redjade.org> References: <419E3907.8000904@mac.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=euc-kr Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <419E3907.8000904@mac.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i cc: net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: using natd to load balance port 80 to multiple servers X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2004 01:29:56 -0000 On Fri, Nov 19, 2004 at 01:18:47PM -0500, Chuck Swiger wrote: > > I will repeat my suggestion that you use a real IP on your webserver and > switch from doing PF + NAT to doing PF or IPFW + bridging instead. Is it possible (in -current of RELENG_5) to filter bridged packets using PF? I know I can do with ipfw/ipf by setting net.link.ether.bridge_ipfw=1 or net.link.ether.bridge_ipf=1. But I cannot find net.link.ether.bridge_pf or the like. Regards, Sangwo Shim