From owner-freebsd-security Sun Nov 7 19:42:31 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from s01.arpa-canada.net (s01.arpa-canada.net [209.104.122.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D5BB14D5C; Sun, 7 Nov 1999 19:42:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from matt@BabCom.ORG) Received: by s01.arpa-canada.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id A806AB885; Sun, 7 Nov 1999 22:42:05 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by s01.arpa-canada.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96F3AE; Sun, 7 Nov 1999 22:41:58 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 7 Nov 1999 22:41:45 -0500 (EST) From: matt X-Sender: matt@s01.arpa-canada.net To: Brian Fundakowski Feldman Cc: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: file name with questions - rm on it seg faults!!! In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sun, 7 Nov 1999, Brian Fundakowski Feldman wrote: [.snip.] : That's correct, since they both use fts(3). I recall that it's still : not fixed; even in OpenBSD's source, it's better than ours getting : crashed, but it's still not fixed properly. By 'not fixed' do you mean that the problem is not "properly" fixed, or that the vulnerabilty is still there? [.snip.] : -- : Brian Fundakowski Feldman \ FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! / : green@FreeBSD.org `------------------------------' -- "If the primates that we came from had known that someday politicians would come out of the...the gene pool, they'd a stayed up in the trees and written evolution off as a bad idea. Hell, I always thought the opposable thumb was overrated." -Sheridan, "A Distant Star" To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message