From owner-freebsd-wireless@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 1 14:46:59 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C87F7106566B for ; Wed, 1 Feb 2012 14:46:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bschmidt@techwires.net) Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f54.google.com (mail-lpp01m010-f54.google.com [209.85.215.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53CEA8FC13 for ; Wed, 1 Feb 2012 14:46:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by lagz14 with SMTP id z14so885015lag.13 for ; Wed, 01 Feb 2012 06:46:58 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.152.122.240 with SMTP id lv16mr13620893lab.34.1328107618265; Wed, 01 Feb 2012 06:46:58 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.152.13.169 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Feb 2012 06:46:58 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [79.140.39.245] In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 15:46:58 +0100 Message-ID: From: Bernhard Schmidt To: "Jeremy C. Reed" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Subject: Re: iwn Centrino N-1030 X-BeenThere: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussions of 802.11 stack, tools device driver development." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2012 14:46:59 -0000 On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 14:55, Jeremy C. Reed wrote: > On Wed, 1 Feb 2012, Bernhard Schmidt wrote: > >> > iwn0: mem 0xf0600000-0xf0601fff irq 17 at device 0.0 on pci2 >> > iwn0: attempting to allocate 1 MSI vectors (1 supported) >> > msi: routing MSI IRQ 257 to local APIC 0 vector 51 >> > iwn0: using IRQ 257 for MSI >> > iwn0: MIMO 1T2R, BGN, address ac:72:89:ec:3b:1e >> >> Strange.. the 1030 is exactly the same as the 6230 (except some small >> difference like the number of mimo stream and 5GHz support). The 6230 >> is what I'm using daily and that one works great. >> >> Do you by any chance have a button/switch to disable bluetooth? I'd >> play around with that one, maybe I've did something wrong with regard >> to bluetooth coexistence. > > I think the bluetooth switch is the same function button as the wireless > switch. Right, which makes sense as the device is a combined BT+WLAN device. Though, my 6230 has 2 buttons, one for BT and one for WLAN and I was thinking you might have that too. Anyways, was just looking for a quick test to rule BTcoex out, which didn't work. -- Bernhard