Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2019 09:10:07 -0700 (PDT) From: "Rodney W. Grimes" <freebsd-rwg@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> To: "Ronald F. Guilmette" <rfg@tristatelogic.com> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Eliminating IPv6 (?) Message-ID: <201906191610.x5JGA7Ep018857@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> In-Reply-To: <23511.1560884385@segfault.tristatelogic.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> In message <23816.53518.998090.665606@jerusalem.litteratus.org>, > Robert Huff <roberthuff@rcn.com> wrote: > > >> Actually, no, that's not how one is supposed to enable one's own set > >> of ipfw ules. To do that, the Handbook (Sec. 30.4.1) says very clearly > >> that one should do: > >> > >> firewall_enable="YES" > >> firewall_type="path-to-my-rules-file" > >> > >> But I'm glad you brought it up. The funny thing is that even that > >> doesn't work properly nowadays *or* like it used to in the past. > > > > If this is true - haven't checked personally - then it's a bug. > >(And a non-trivial one, the fact you're the first to report it > >notwithstanding.) > > Can you please open a bug report? > > I aim to please. As requested: > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=238694 Thank you. -- Rod Grimes rgrimes@freebsd.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201906191610.x5JGA7Ep018857>