From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 20 19:53:55 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 732F5106564A for ; Sat, 20 Dec 2008 19:53:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28CF78FC1C for ; Sat, 20 Dec 2008 19:53:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id mBKJribu010046; Sat, 20 Dec 2008 20:53:44 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) with ESMTP id mBKJrhNh010043; Sat, 20 Dec 2008 20:53:43 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 20:53:43 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Martes G Wigglesworth In-Reply-To: <1229798135.1583.20.camel@MGW_1> Message-ID: <20081220205029.F10042@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <1229788709.1583.16.camel@MGW_1> <20081220172702.B9566@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <1229798135.1583.20.camel@MGW_1> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Network Stack Code Re-write (Possible motivations...?) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 19:53:55 -0000 > Thank you very much for the intuitive commentary. > > Sorry for making the inquiry so specific to Juniper, however, I could > not think of another source that would be a good example. I fully > understand how the inquiries appeared, however, thanks for answering > what you could. can't you simply ask some juniper employee? anyway - from where did you got that info about network stack being rewritten? > > I, as you, can't really figure out why they felt, years ago, that they > needed to re-invent the wheel. once again - first ask WHAT EXACTLY FreeBSD is doing in their router? a) just preparing tables for router chips? - then FreeBSD's network stack is OK b) actually performing part of routing activity cooperating with ASIC's? if so - rewriting/modifying network stack was needed for sure.