From owner-freebsd-stable Fri May 7 16:43:33 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from shell.webmaster.com (mail.webmaster.com [209.133.28.73]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B35CF15397 for ; Fri, 7 May 1999 16:43:30 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from davids@webmaster.com) Received: from whenever ([209.133.29.2]) by shell.webmaster.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-12345L500S10000V35) with SMTP id com; Fri, 7 May 1999 16:43:29 -0700 From: "David Schwartz" To: "David Knapp" Cc: Subject: RE: Stability concerns in latest -STABLEs. Date: Fri, 7 May 1999 16:43:29 -0700 Message-ID: <000001be98e3$68b4cc70$021d85d1@whenever.youwant.to> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2377.0 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <37337A30.2DF8756@luciamar.k12.ca.us> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3155.0 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Theoretically, STABLE should be better, since it will have bugs fixed after the release. In reality, though, it doesn't always work that way. DS > I'm a newbie, so maybe I don't understand, but why not go with 3.1 > RELEASE? Shouldn't it be more stable or as stable as 3.1-STABLE? > > dbk To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message