From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 11 14:04:21 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4AD07483 for ; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 14:04:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp5.hushmail.com (smtp5.hushmail.com [65.39.178.142]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.hushmail.com", Issuer "smtp.hushmail.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D2598E for ; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 14:04:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp5.hushmail.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp5.hushmail.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 842D46041F for ; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 14:04:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.hushmail.com (w3.hushmail.com [65.39.178.62]) by smtp5.hushmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 14:04:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.hushmail.com (Postfix, from userid 99) id 1646CC044F; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 14:04:20 +0000 (UTC) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 14:04:19 +0000 To: "Polytropon" Subject: Re: Limiting CPU on some processes on web server From: opendaddy@hushmail.com In-Reply-To: <20150311144958.3ef9519d.freebsd@edvax.de> References: <20150311122656.96F2020341@smtp.hushmail.com> <20150311141347.1013d42d.freebsd@edvax.de> <20150311134232.838ABC0451@smtp.hushmail.com> <20150311144958.3ef9519d.freebsd@edvax.de> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Message-Id: <20150311140420.1646CC044F@smtp.hushmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 14:04:21 -0000 On 11. mars 2015 at 1:41 PM, "Polytropon" wrote: > >The main differnce in functionality is that ulimit -t defines >the limit as time, whereas cpulimit defines it as percentage >of CPU resources used. > >Another difference is that ulimit comes with FreeBSD's default >scripting shell, whereas cpulimit is a Linux program that has >to be compiled from source, after porting it, of course. :-) > Sounds really tempting especially considering those other cpulimit compile errors. Is there a CPU time limit equivalent to say 20% or have I totally misunderstood? O.D.