From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 8 08:26:43 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F21E1065682; Tue, 8 Jul 2008 08:26:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from paul@gtcomm.net) Received: from atlas.gtcomm.net (atlas.gtcomm.net [67.215.15.242]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40DDB8FC1D; Tue, 8 Jul 2008 08:26:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from paul@gtcomm.net) Received: from c-76-108-197-4.hsd1.fl.comcast.net ([76.108.197.4] helo=[192.168.1.6]) by atlas.gtcomm.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1KG8T6-00074M-QC; Tue, 08 Jul 2008 04:22:36 -0400 Message-ID: <4873253D.3070707@gtcomm.net> Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2008 04:28:45 -0400 From: Paul User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Windows/20080421) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kip Macy References: <4867420D.7090406@gtcomm.net> <486A7E45.3030902@gtcomm.net> <486A8F24.5010000@gtcomm.net> <486A9A0E.6060308@elischer.org> <486B41D5.3060609@gtcomm.net> <4871E85C.8090907@freebsd.org> <48726422.7050703@gtcomm.net> <200807080107.m6817XxO021966@lava.sentex.ca> <4873222B.4080907@moneybookers.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Net , Mike Tancsa , Andre Oppermann , Stefan Lambrev Subject: Re: Freebsd IP Forwarding performance (question, and some info) [7-stable, current, em, smp] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2008 08:26:43 -0000 Will someone confirm if it will support the 82571EB ? I don't see a reason why not as it's very similar hardware and it's available now in large quantities so making 82571 part of igb I think would be a good idea. Kip Macy wrote: >>> I have a pre-production card. With some bug fixes and some tuning of >>> interrupt handling (custom stack - I've been asked to push the changes >>> back in to CVS, I just don't have time right now) an otherwise >>> unoptimized igb can forward 1.04Mpps from one port to another (1.04 >>> Mpps in on igb0 and 1.04 Mpps out on igb1) using 3.5 cores on an 8 >>> core system. >>> >>> >>> >> Is this on 1gbps or on 10gbps NIC? >> > > Hi Stefan, > The hardware that igb supports is just the latest revision of the > hardware supported by em, i.e. it is 1gbps. > > Cheers, > Kip > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >