From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Mar 20 07:04:30 2015
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 85A77C60;
 Fri, 20 Mar 2015 07:04:30 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-wg0-x22e.google.com (mail-wg0-x22e.google.com
 [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::22e])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D439CBD;
 Fri, 20 Mar 2015 07:04:30 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by wgra20 with SMTP id a20so81555882wgr.3;
 Fri, 20 Mar 2015 00:04:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:sender:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type;
 bh=AiMUui6O8aJ1tOYN321ACSfJQJp563e/hKQC3+VeKIQ=;
 b=ZYfJIk2JxQwu6v0aJoJFC2c3tLazyEz4nR+E4gBkz8jgKpcKGfNeUpoOkW3TN3PJZN
 zeELmVPWfFZad31wpNb7AuU41AkpdV/Opyl5haa/QmhbbfL7uIdqaZwux0VpuOocEjOL
 HW6+UQEEub+IEngqB/GPekU/EBOay59/E5PjI5+GuCVci+8XkoqoWixwZ9QxkSeuHx89
 BbY4/jjMRRWXX/+Ul5ItnaLU3Ldr5ee7i6KaT5Ovyz0VEsiadJAT6gGfGIi/gCO0l1CZ
 FCEkYHfcREXPsqxhSdmhMNn/arnYI7AEVxMdsskkEmI5oPUMLZbozqcj7rbRzJrUWLy7
 OhQw==
X-Received: by 10.180.91.79 with SMTP id cc15mr21590516wib.37.1426835068455;
 Fri, 20 Mar 2015 00:04:28 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: fedor.indutny@gmail.com
Received: by 10.27.9.208 with HTTP; Fri, 20 Mar 2015 00:04:08 -0700 (PDT)
From: Fedor Indutny <fedor@indutny.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2015 00:04:08 -0700
X-Google-Sender-Auth: H97mPTGqxPq8cUhBE40ItEA_6cY
Message-ID: <CAEv2Vf+5ZPeopNnya__4FOqgz-1+RThp=pA-WYiaxTM_+Hw8Wg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: `SA_SIGINFO | SA_RESETHAND` fix backport (DUP)
To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1
Cc: Mark Johnston <markj@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
 <freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-current>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
 <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2015 07:04:30 -0000

Hello people!

While trying to fix node.js/io.js issue with signal handling
on FreeBSD 10.1, I have found that the problem was due to a kernel
bug. Luckily that bug is fixed in:

https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd/commit/4501dadd00cece6d06392c42e5fc6af07731e451

But it looks like the fix wasn't backported to 10.x .

Do you think it might be possible to do it? I'd really appreciate
this.

Thank you,
Fedor.

P.S.

Sent the duplicate of this before, but I wasn't on the mailing list so
it fell into the moderation list.