From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Sep 13 07:34:48 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F0D18E1
 for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Sat, 13 Sep 2014 07:34:48 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from puchar.net (puchar.net [188.252.31.250])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C763A8E2
 for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Sat, 13 Sep 2014 07:34:47 +0000 (UTC)
Received: Received: from 127.0.0.1 (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by puchar.net (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s8D7YaxC092461;
 Sat, 13 Sep 2014 09:34:36 +0200 (CEST)
 (envelope-from wojtek@puchar.net)
X-Authentication-Warning: puchar.net: Host puchar-wojtek.intra [10.0.224.6]
 claimed to be wojtek.dom
Received: from wojtek.dom (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by wojtek.dom (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s8D7YabT018155;
 Sat, 13 Sep 2014 09:34:36 +0200 (CEST)
 (envelope-from wojtek@puchar.net)
Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost)
 by wojtek.dom (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) with ESMTP id s8D7YZsg018152;
 Sat, 13 Sep 2014 09:34:35 +0200 (CEST)
 (envelope-from wojtek@puchar.net)
X-Authentication-Warning: wojtek.dom: wojtek owned process doing -bs
Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2014 09:34:35 +0200 (CEST)
From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@puchar.net>
X-X-Sender: wojtek@wojtek.dom
To: John-Mark Gurney <jmg@funkthat.com>
Subject: Re: openssl with aes-in or padlock
In-Reply-To: <20140912004541.GQ82175@funkthat.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1409130933410.18147@wojtek.dom>
References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1409111858470.1185@wojtek.dom>
 <20140911180258.GN82175@funkthat.com>
 <alpine.BSF.2.00.1409112332160.2140@wojtek.dom>
 <20140912004541.GQ82175@funkthat.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3
 (puchar.net [10.0.1.1]); Sat, 13 Sep 2014 09:34:36 +0200 (CEST)
Cc: hackers@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
 <freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-hackers>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
 <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2014 07:34:48 -0000

>> MUCH faster with AES-NI.
>
> Well, AES-NI CBC may be faster w/ AES-NI, but it's not as fast as using
> another mode...  AES-XTS should be many times faster than CBC...  Also,

30% maybe with geli.

> above you compared two different modes... on CBC encrypt (the OpenSSL
> test) and CBC decrypt (the geli test) so of course you're going to get
> very different performances...
>
> You didn't tell me if you're using a new enough version of OpenSSL or
> not..  What release are you using?  iirc, 10.0-R was the first release
OpenSSL 1.0.1e-freebsd 11 Feb 2013