From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Aug 11 6:14:34 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from gaia.euronet.nl (gaia.euronet.nl [194.134.0.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEBE814BF6; Wed, 11 Aug 1999 06:14:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcel@scc.nl) Received: from mail.scc.nl (i006.ztm.euronet.nl [194.134.112.7]) by gaia.euronet.nl (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA03643; Wed, 11 Aug 1999 15:13:06 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from scc.nl (scones.sup.scc.nl [192.168.2.4]) by mail.scc.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA29704; Wed, 11 Aug 1999 15:12:50 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from marcel@scc.nl) Message-ID: <37B176D2.BBD02F00@scc.nl> Date: Wed, 11 Aug 1999 15:12:50 +0200 From: Marcel Moolenaar Organization: SCC vof X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 4.0-CURRENT i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tim Vanderhoek Cc: jesusr@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/13060: linux_base-5.2 fails to install References: <199908110040.RAA39928@freefall.freebsd.org> <37B13BCC.4F8656A9@scc.nl> <19990811083813.B34584@mad> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Tim Vanderhoek wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 11, 1999 at 11:01:00AM +0200, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > >> > >>> bash-1.14.7-13.i386.rpm > >>> ELF interpreter /compat/linux/lib/ld-linux.so.2 not found > >>> execution of script failed > >>> error: /usr/ports/distfiles/rpm/bash-1.14.7-13.i386.rpm cannot be installed > >>> *** Error code 1 > > > > # ELF interpreter /compat/linux/lib/ld-linux.so.2 not found > > # execution of script failed > > # -- > > # > > NEEDLOADLINK= true > > Although the PR was submitted from a machine dated Aug. 9. That > doesn't mean the sources are current from Aug. 9, of course... Exactly. > Jesus, can you clarify? I already sort of asked him. > I'm almost tempted to suggest making NEEDLOADLINK the default, > since more people than I expected are running blindly into it. The changes I made to the Makefile are subtle. I've changed .if ${OSVERSION} < 320001 into .if ${OSVERSION} <= 320001 already. So, I don't expect any problems on -stable machines. -current is a different story altogether. -- Marcel Moolenaar mailto:marcel@scc.nl SCC Internetworking & Databases http://www.scc.nl/ Amsterdam, The Netherlands tel: +31 20 4200655 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message