From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 9 08:32:37 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 811182E1 for ; Fri, 9 Aug 2013 08:32:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@passap.ru) Received: from forward6l.mail.yandex.net (forward6l.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:1819::6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43D092774 for ; Fri, 9 Aug 2013 08:32:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp2h.mail.yandex.net (smtp2h.mail.yandex.net [84.201.187.145]) by forward6l.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 82DFD14E1068; Fri, 9 Aug 2013 12:32:34 +0400 (MSK) Received: from smtp2h.mail.yandex.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2h.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 0D85B17016CC; Fri, 9 Aug 2013 12:32:33 +0400 (MSK) Received: from 93.91.10.81.tel.ru (93.91.10.81.tel.ru [93.91.10.81]) by smtp2h.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTP id a3QpFdJJGN-WXp0GBPe; Fri, 9 Aug 2013 12:32:33 +0400 Message-ID: <5204A921.2050103@passap.ru> Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2013 12:32:33 +0400 From: Boris Samorodov Organization: =?UTF-8?B?0JfQkNCeICLQktCQ0KDQoiI=?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130806 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kevin Oberman Subject: Re: UPDATING 20130731 gio-fam-backend References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: FreeBSD GNOME Users X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2013 08:32:37 -0000 09.08.2013 01:26, Kevin Oberman пишет: > I believe the note on in UPDATING 20130731 is incorrect, as least as far as > portmaster. I don't use portupgrade, So do I. > so I can't say how it behaves. This > also assumes that pkgng is not in use. > > If you do "portmaster -r gio-fam-backend" it will fail as it treats glib20 > as a replacement for gio-fam-backend. I doubt it. How a single command "portmaster -r gio-fam-backend" may even know about glib20? And IMHO glib20 cannot be used as a replacement. From PORTMASTER(8) about -r option: "is for "rebuild the specified port, and all ports that depend on it." > As a result, after building the new > glib port, it tries to install it without deleting the old version and > fails. This can be avoided by using the command "pkg_delete -f glib-2.\*" > before the instructions currently provided. > > Also, depending on the version of portmaster, gio-fam-backend may be > automatically deleted by the portmaster -r command, so the pkg_delete of > gio-fam-backend may fail. > > I have updated about a half dozen systems and all have required that the > gio-fam-backend be deleted first to allow the portmaster -r to work. So did I (about a half dozen systems) and I did what is suggested at UPDATING (rebuild ports with -r option and then remove gio-fam- backend). Modulo some problems due to new ld properties at CURRENT all went smooth. FYI: here is my .portmasterrc: ----- PM_SU_CMD=/usr/local/bin/sudo BACKUP=bopt MAKE_PACKAGE=gopt DONT_SCRUB_DISTFILES=Dopt SAVE_SHARED=wopt ----- -- WBR, Boris Samorodov (bsam) FreeBSD Committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve