From owner-freebsd-net Wed Jul 22 16:13:03 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id QAA15952 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Wed, 22 Jul 1998 16:13:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from mail.camalott.com (root@[208.203.140.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id QAA15943 for ; Wed, 22 Jul 1998 16:12:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from joelh@gnu.org) Received: from detlev.UUCP (tex-61.camalott.com [208.229.74.61]) by mail.camalott.com (8.8.7/8.8.5) with ESMTP id SAA27014; Wed, 22 Jul 1998 18:13:17 -0500 Received: (from joelh@localhost) by detlev.UUCP (8.8.8/8.8.8) id SAA01602; Wed, 22 Jul 1998 18:12:21 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from joelh) Date: Wed, 22 Jul 1998 18:12:21 -0500 (CDT) Message-Id: <199807222312.SAA01602@detlev.UUCP> To: opsys@mail.webspan.net CC: mike.crawfurd@cmg.nl, freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: (message from Open Systems Networking on Wed, 22 Jul 1998 18:50:51 -0400 (EDT)) Subject: Re: Samba FS From: Joel Ray Holveck Reply-to: joelh@gnu.org References: Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org >> Export your directories and printers using Samba. Mount directories >> using Rumba. They're both in the ports. Samba is top notch, and >> Rumba is OK, although naturally it combines all the disadvantages of >> SMB with all the disadvantages of NFS. > I thought someone replaced samba with sharity-light. But I just looked and > there both still there. Anyway you might also want to look at > sharity-light as well: Sharity-light is similar to Rumba. I haven't heard of it before today, so didn't mention it. Happy hacking, joelh -- Joel Ray Holveck - joelh@gnu.org - http://www.wp.com/piquan Fourth law of programming: Anything that can go wrong wi sendmail: segmentation violation - core dumped To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message