From owner-freebsd-isp  Mon Aug  4 18:16:25 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-isp>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id SAA10361
          for isp-outgoing; Mon, 4 Aug 1997 18:16:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from panda.hilink.com.au (panda.hilink.com.au [203.8.15.25])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id SAA10348
          for <isp@FreeBSD.ORG>; Mon, 4 Aug 1997 18:16:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from danny@localhost)
	by panda.hilink.com.au (8.8.5/8.8.5) id LAA05498;
	Tue, 5 Aug 1997 11:20:42 +1000 (EST)
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 1997 11:20:41 +1000 (EST)
From: "Daniel O'Callaghan" <danny@panda.hilink.com.au>
To: Steven Ames <steve@news.cioe.com>
cc: isp@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: front page .. which emulation?
In-Reply-To: <199708041750.MAA29479@news.cioe.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.970805111927.1774X-100000@panda.hilink.com.au>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk


On Mon, 4 Aug 1997, Steven Ames wrote:

> 
> Since there is no FreeBSD binary of the front page extensions (something
> that I really think Microsoft should remedy...), which version do I use?
> 
> I tried the BSDI ones (thinking that freebsd had binary compatibility
> with BSDI), but they didn't go... should I try the linux ones next?
> 
> BTW, 'didn't go' translates to: Exec format error. Wrong Architecture.

Unpack the bsdi kit and replace perl with a freebsd version.  It is the 
perl which does not work, not the fp.

Danny