From owner-freebsd-doc Thu Mar 28 9: 0:52 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from rwcrmhc52.attbi.com (rwcrmhc52.attbi.com [216.148.227.88]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B28F37B434; Thu, 28 Mar 2002 09:00:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from bmah.dyndns.org ([12.233.149.189]) by rwcrmhc52.attbi.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.27 201-229-121-127-20010626) with ESMTP id <20020328170044.CIHC1147.rwcrmhc52.attbi.com@bmah.dyndns.org>; Thu, 28 Mar 2002 17:00:44 +0000 Received: from intruder.bmah.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by bmah.dyndns.org (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g2SH0hd8034368; Thu, 28 Mar 2002 09:00:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bmah@intruder.bmah.org) Received: (from bmah@localhost) by intruder.bmah.org (8.12.2/8.12.2/Submit) id g2SH0h5i034367; Thu, 28 Mar 2002 09:00:43 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200203281700.g2SH0h5i034367@intruder.bmah.org> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 To: Niall Brady Cc: bmah@freebsd.org, nik@freebsd.org, freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: docproj port problem In-reply-to: <200203240003.aa95290@salmon.maths.tcd.ie> References: <200203240003.aa95290@salmon.maths.tcd.ie> Comments: In-reply-to Niall Brady message dated "Sun, 24 Mar 2002 00:03:07 +0000." From: bmah@freebsd.org (Bruce A. Mah) Reply-To: bmah@freebsd.org X-Face: g~c`.{#4q0"(V*b#g[i~rXgm*w;:nMfz%_RZLma)UgGN&=j`5vXoU^@n5v4:OO)c["!w)nD/!!~e4Sj7LiT'6*wZ83454H""lb{CC%T37O!!'S$S&D}sem7I[A 2V%N&+ X-Image-Url: http://www.employees.org/~bmah/Images/bmah-cisco-small.gif X-Url: http://www.employees.org/~bmah/ Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2002 09:00:43 -0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org If memory serves me right, Niall Brady wrote: > On Thu, 21 Mar 2002 14:25:35 PST, bmah@freebsd.org said: > > > >With my RE team hat on, I'll say we can probably hold a day or two. I > >put the rest of RE on notice that there's a small problem so there > >won't be any surprises. > > Best to back it out... I'm a bit all over the place with work these > days... no point holding up the release ;-) I'll fix it after... OK, done. Actually, I realized later that we don't actually do releases using JADETEX=yes anyways, so technically speaking it won't break the release. Still, we need to figure this out. One alternative might be to have Yet Another Knob that says, in essence, "don't assume that TeX is installed in the normal place, but use kpsewhich from an existing TeX installation to find it". Thanks! Bruce. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message