Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2014 12:52:07 +0800 From: Jia-Shiun Li <jiashiun@gmail.com> To: Ian Lepore <ian@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org, freebsd-arch <freebsd-arch@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Teach mdmfs about tmpfs and use tmpfs in rc scripts Message-ID: <CAHNYxxNSjNMg8hMGL2d%2B223P6gwFJUU%2Bdxnbqcz08SR5A-JDFQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1394148413.1149.348.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> References: <1394148413.1149.348.camel@revolution.hippie.lan>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 7:26 AM, Ian Lepore <ian@freebsd.org> wrote: > > Thoughts? > Is it ok to default mdmfs to tmpfs behavior? Not sure if anyone would like to have explicit allocation e.g. failing early on insufficient memory, rather than failing on write. If so then at least 'md' should be in the options in addition to 'auto' and 'tmpfs' when both md and tmpfs are available from kernel. -Jia-Shiun.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAHNYxxNSjNMg8hMGL2d%2B223P6gwFJUU%2Bdxnbqcz08SR5A-JDFQ>