From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 13 23:25:19 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0F6E1065670; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 23:25:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (agora.rdrop.com [IPv6:2607:f678:1010::34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFA1D8FC0A; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 23:25:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (66@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.7) with ESMTP id pADNPEUo099334 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sun, 13 Nov 2011 15:25:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.9/Submit) with UUCP id pADNPEgi099333; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 15:25:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from fbsd81 ([192.168.200.81]) by pluto.rain.com (4.1/SMI-4.1-pluto-M2060407) id AA28726; Sun, 13 Nov 11 15:17:34 PST Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2011 22:17:21 -0800 From: perryh@pluto.rain.com To: ed@80386.nl Message-Id: <4ec0b271.XEX0E3cu8vL6mgou%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <20111110123919.GF2164@hoeg.nl> <4EBC4B6E.4060607@FreeBSD.org> <20111111112821.GP2164@hoeg.nl> <4EBDC06F.6020907@FreeBSD.org> <20111112103918.GV2164@hoeg.nl> <4EBF0003.3060401@FreeBSD.org> <20111113091940.GX2164@hoeg.nl> In-Reply-To: <20111113091940.GX2164@hoeg.nl> User-Agent: nail 11.25 7/29/05 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: dougb@freebsd.org, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: The strangeness called `sbin' X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2011 23:25:20 -0000 Ed Schouten wrote: > I think John Doe would agree a compiler suite is something more > `administrative' than an application to send emails, yet they are > placed in bin and sbin respectively. A compiler is certainly used by ordinary users (e.g. programming students), not solely by administrators. While sendmail is involved in sending mail, it is an MTA (not an MUA) and therefore is not ordinarily run from the command line other than when debugging. It's not at all clear to me why sendmail should be in either /sbin or /bin: historically it was in /usr/lib, along with other programs that were expected to be invoked by other programs (or by rc scripts) and thus should not be in PATH.