Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2002 21:42:06 -0800 From: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net> To: jason andrade <jason@dstc.edu.au> Cc: Olafur Osvaldsson <oli@isnic.is>, hubs@FreeBSD.ORG, re@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ia64 5.0-RC2 available Message-ID: <20021221054206.GA1682@athlon.pn.xcllnt.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.44.0212211522280.11825-100000@sunburn.dstc.edu.au> References: <20021221051319.GC1442@athlon.pn.xcllnt.net> <Pine.GSO.4.44.0212211522280.11825-100000@sunburn.dstc.edu.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Dec 21, 2002 at 03:26:42PM +1000, jason andrade wrote: > > > > > > Why don't you use the same format for the iso dir as usual? > > > > > > .../releases/ia64/ISO-IMAGES/5.0-RC2/CHECKSUM.MD5 > > > .../releases/ia64/ISO-IMAGES/5.0-RC2/disc2.iso > > > .../releases/ia64/ISO-IMAGES/5.0-RC2/miniinst.iso > > > > Our release process has changed to create the new names. It was > > a suggestion made on this list by an Australian mirror operator > > i'll take the blame :-) Sorry Jason, I forgot your name... and I think it's credit, not blame :-) > > To me the immediate consequence was that there was no need for > > a 5.0-RC2 subdirectory under ISO-IMAGES, because the release > > name was already in the ISO file name. I'm not sure if the > > same is done for the other platforms. Basicly because we haven't > > discussed this. > > the advantage in keeping releases in separate directories is that > it makes it easier to exclude for mirror admins by separting > things out. Good point. I didn't realize that. I'll move the ISO images into a 5.0-RC2 directory right away. Sorry for the trouble, -- Marcel Moolenaar USPA: A-39004 marcel@xcllnt.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hubs" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021221054206.GA1682>