From owner-freebsd-hubs Fri Dec 20 21:42:18 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AC3C37B401; Fri, 20 Dec 2002 21:42:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from kayak.xcllnt.net (209-128-86-226.BAYAREA.NET [209.128.86.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C79E43EDE; Fri, 20 Dec 2002 21:42:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marcel@xcllnt.net) Received: from athlon.pn.xcllnt.net (athlon.pn.xcllnt.net [192.168.4.3]) by kayak.xcllnt.net (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id gBL5g6rT091946; Fri, 20 Dec 2002 21:42:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marcel@kayak.pn.xcllnt.net) Received: from athlon.pn.xcllnt.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by athlon.pn.xcllnt.net (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id gBL5g6JK001694; Fri, 20 Dec 2002 21:42:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marcel@athlon.pn.xcllnt.net) Received: (from marcel@localhost) by athlon.pn.xcllnt.net (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) id gBL5g6OO001693; Fri, 20 Dec 2002 21:42:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marcel) Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2002 21:42:06 -0800 From: Marcel Moolenaar To: jason andrade Cc: Olafur Osvaldsson , hubs@FreeBSD.ORG, re@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ia64 5.0-RC2 available Message-ID: <20021221054206.GA1682@athlon.pn.xcllnt.net> References: <20021221051319.GC1442@athlon.pn.xcllnt.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i Sender: owner-freebsd-hubs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sat, Dec 21, 2002 at 03:26:42PM +1000, jason andrade wrote: > > > > > > Why don't you use the same format for the iso dir as usual? > > > > > > .../releases/ia64/ISO-IMAGES/5.0-RC2/CHECKSUM.MD5 > > > .../releases/ia64/ISO-IMAGES/5.0-RC2/disc2.iso > > > .../releases/ia64/ISO-IMAGES/5.0-RC2/miniinst.iso > > > > Our release process has changed to create the new names. It was > > a suggestion made on this list by an Australian mirror operator > > i'll take the blame :-) Sorry Jason, I forgot your name... and I think it's credit, not blame :-) > > To me the immediate consequence was that there was no need for > > a 5.0-RC2 subdirectory under ISO-IMAGES, because the release > > name was already in the ISO file name. I'm not sure if the > > same is done for the other platforms. Basicly because we haven't > > discussed this. > > the advantage in keeping releases in separate directories is that > it makes it easier to exclude for mirror admins by separting > things out. Good point. I didn't realize that. I'll move the ISO images into a 5.0-RC2 directory right away. Sorry for the trouble, -- Marcel Moolenaar USPA: A-39004 marcel@xcllnt.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hubs" in the body of the message