From owner-freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 3 09:28:37 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65E1C16A40F for ; Mon, 3 Jul 2006 09:28:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from flag@newluxor.wired.org) Received: from mail.oltrelinux.com (krisma.oltrelinux.com [194.242.226.43]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E888A43D46 for ; Mon, 3 Jul 2006 09:28:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from flag@newluxor.wired.org) Received: from newluxor.wired.org (ip-91-122.sn1.eutelia.it [62.94.91.122]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.oltrelinux.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 500E711AE56; Mon, 3 Jul 2006 11:28:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from flag@localhost) by newluxor.wired.org (8.13.7/8.13.7/Submit) id k639Rcsu002430; Mon, 3 Jul 2006 11:27:38 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from flag) Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2006 11:27:37 +0200 From: Paolo Pisati To: Vini Engel Message-ID: <20060703092737.GA2387@tin.it> References: <20060514220549.GA721@tin.it> <44A7E96C.3040200@fugspbr.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <44A7E96C.3040200@fugspbr.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at krisma.oltrelinux.com Cc: FreeBSD_Ipfw Subject: Re: [6.x patchset] Ipfw nat and libalias modules X-BeenThere: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: IPFW Technical Discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2006 09:28:37 -0000 On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 01:42:36AM +1000, Vini Engel wrote: > Paolo Pisati said the following on 15/05/06 08:05: > > Released a new revision of my libalias+ipfw work as a > > patchset for 6.x, get it here: > > http://mercurio.srv.dsi.unimi.it/~pisati/libalias/libalias-6.x.tgz > > > > fixed the checksum corruption occurring to redirected/generated traffic > > to/by a local interface on the nat box. > > > > For more info: > > http://wikitest.freebsd.org/moin.cgi/PaoloPisati > > Hi guys, > > I was wondering how stable this is at the moment? I am very keen on > using it on my production box(es) but would like to hear someone else's > experience first. i know there're people using it on their productions boxes and i didn't hear anyone complaining, so i assume the code is stable. BTW i just started to cleanup my patch for HEAD, but it'll take a bit before i finish everything, so fell free to use the previous patch. bye -- Paolo Piso's first law: nothing works as expected!