From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Dec  6 12:40:34 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28C7B16A531
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Tue,  6 Dec 2005 12:40:34 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from freebsd-stable@m.gmane.org)
Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 120B343D68
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Tue,  6 Dec 2005 12:40:32 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from freebsd-stable@m.gmane.org)
Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Ejc5I-0000II-Fh
	for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2005 13:38:16 +0100
Received: from murdoc.gwi.net ([207.5.142.8])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
	id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Tue, 06 Dec 2005 13:38:16 +0100
Received: from jcoombs by murdoc.gwi.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
	id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Tue, 06 Dec 2005 13:38:16 +0100
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
From: "Joshua Coombs" <jcoombs@gwi.net>
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2005 07:37:59 -0500
Lines: 22
Message-ID: <dn40n8$5rc$1@sea.gmane.org>
References: <dn2shd$2sr$1@sea.gmane.org> <20051206063134.GA57230@sysadm.stc>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
	reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: murdoc.gwi.net
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2527
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2527
Sender: news <news@sea.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: ZERO_COPY_SOCKETS
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2005 12:40:34 -0000


"Igor Robul" <igorr@speechpro.com> wrote in message 
news:20051206063134.GA57230@sysadm.stc...
> On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 09:20:28PM -0500, Joshua Coombs wrote:
>> #options                ZERO_COPY_SOCKETS
>>
>> What's the status of this in 6.0-R and 6-stable?  The idea of 
>> avoiding
>> memory copies when possible seems really appealing for my 386, on
>> which any little boost is significant. : )
> http://www.freebsd.org/releases/6.0R/relnotes-i386.html#KERNEL
>
> So you can't use FreeBSD-6.0 and greater on 80386 anymore.

Ok, lemmie just point out that I'm already running 6.0, just to 
eliminate that issue.

What I'm curious about is weather or not 6.0R's zero copy sockets are 
considered stable or not.

Joshua Coombs