Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 17:51:03 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fernando_Apestegu=EDa?= <fernando.apesteguia@gmail.com> To: Reko Turja <reko.turja@liukuma.net> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ports building automatically with default options? Message-ID: <CAGwOe2Z7HVFZb0jG0LeK81rLSk6wxMQSLcZQmzai5HyJQp9VHg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <9B4C537601E64EE1BD4C8FC6C5CEFDCE@Rivendell> References: <EED1BC78E7CA47D38C582EAAB06DA714@Rivendell> <44ipdm4cy4.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> <9B4C537601E64EE1BD4C8FC6C5CEFDCE@Rivendell>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 5:48 PM, Reko Turja <reko.turja@liukuma.net> wrote: > -----Original Message----- From: Lowell Gilbert > > >> The defaults haven't changed, so something must have happened locally. >> Check whether you've got BATCH defined in make.conf, and whether >> /var/db/ports contains configurations for those ports. > > > That's the strange thing... Virgin system, just updated ports tree and index > & started building. No knobs in make.conf and /var/db/ports is empty... Strange really... Did you see a message like "Found saved configuration for $port"? Did you try to see what happens if you run "make rmconfig" on those ports? > > I wonder if there's some kind of hickup going on at cvsup.se.freebsd.org... > > -Reko > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAGwOe2Z7HVFZb0jG0LeK81rLSk6wxMQSLcZQmzai5HyJQp9VHg>