Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 07:31:07 +0100 From: Dominic Fandrey <kamikaze@bsdforen.de> To: "E. J. Cerejo" <ejcerejo@optonline.net> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libicui18n.so.36 not found, required by "evolution" Message-ID: <47AFEBAB.8010907@bsdforen.de> In-Reply-To: <47AF8B22.2010903@optonline.net> References: <47ADE033.7070402@optonline.net> <47ADE2EC.2030906@infracaninophile.co.uk> <47ADEAD2.2030803@bsdforen.de> <200802092346.23078.ejcerejo@optonline.net> <47AEF9B5.10509@onetel.com> <20080210084035.551b9acf@scorpio> <47AF16F8.3040109@optonline.net> <20080210122358.4dc52efd@scorpio> <47AF389E.2010909@optonline.net> <47AF3B98.7060901@bsdforen.de> <47AF8B22.2010903@optonline.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
E. J. Cerejo wrote: > Dominic Fandrey wrote: >> E. J. Cerejo wrote: >>> Gerard wrote: >>>> On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 10:23:36 -0500 >>>> "E. J. Cerejo" <ejcerejo@optonline.net> wrote: >>>> >>>> [snip] >>>> >>>>> Can portmanager work in conjection with portupgrade? >>>>> >>>> >>>> Yes, I use it all the time. >>>> >>>> >>>>> Why has the ports tree be up to date? >>>>> >>>> >>>> What conceivable reason would you have for using an outdated ports >>>> tree? >>>> >>>> >>>>> Will portmanager download anything from the cvsup repos? >>>>> >>>> >>>> It will only fetch programs that need updating, just like portupgrade. >>>> >>>> Would you be so kind as to explain your reluctance to update your >>>> system? The number of potential programs that need updating seems >>>> rather immaterial when compared to the potential system wide >>>> improvement in its overall performance. You could simply start the >>>> upgrade in the evening when you are through using the PC. Depending on >>>> the speed of your machine, it might very well be done by the next >>>> morning, if not sooner. >>>> >>> My system was updated yesterday and I'm trying to resolve the issues >>> that arose from the updating. I can't update my system everyday I >>> just don't have time for it. >> >> If you don't want to rebuild the stuff, just add >> >> libicui18n.so.36 libicui18n.so >> >> to your /etc/libmap.conf file. This solution works if no functions >> have been removed from the library interface, which only very rarely >> happens. > > I just ran pkg_libchk -m piped to a file but looks pretty confusing, is > there a way to get only the output for the lines containing > /usr/local/lib/libicui18n.so.38? I can reccomend you the -q option, which will give you a very clean output simply listing all the packages that have problems. Without the -q option the program shows its status, which is not well readable in a file, because it doesn't use \n but \r. That you get output with the -m/--mean flag, but not without means that the false positive detection is erroneous. For the time being I'd recommend you to use the libmap.conf solution. Later this day I will add some debugging functionality to the script and send that version to you, if you are willing to spend your time helping me finding this problem.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?47AFEBAB.8010907>