From owner-freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Fri Jan 10 19:07:07 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-virtualization@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EE281F0923 for ; Fri, 10 Jan 2020 19:07:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47vXXq3MhWz3yrw for ; Fri, 10 Jan 2020 19:07:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 71C641F0922; Fri, 10 Jan 2020 19:07:07 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: virtualization@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7189B1F0921 for ; Fri, 10 Jan 2020 19:07:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47vXXq2V5wz3yrv for ; Fri, 10 Jan 2020 19:07:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C4CC1E9BF for ; Fri, 10 Jan 2020 19:07:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 00AJ77Iv040293 for ; Fri, 10 Jan 2020 19:07:07 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 00AJ77nb040292 for virtualization@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 10 Jan 2020 19:07:07 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: virtualization@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 241774] FreeBSD 11.3 & 12.0 has broken SCSI & Networking on KVM/QEMU Q35 with OVMF Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2020 19:07:07 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.3-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: vmaffione@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: virtualization@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion of various virtualization techniques FreeBSD supports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2020 19:07:07 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D241774 --- Comment #24 from Vincenzo Maffione --- (In reply to John Hartley from comment #22) MFC r339639 does not add netmap support to e1000, vtnet & co. Such support exists since FreeBSD 10. Moreover, netmap code is platform independent, so = it does not make sense that a bug in netmap would show up in Q35 and not in the other platform. It is more reasonable that the issue is related to the PCI code. If I get it correctly, your issue is that you don't detect devices (e.g. you don't see em0 or vtnet0 in ifconfig). If this happens, it means that the device_probe routine of the proper driver is not called, or maybe it is cal= led but it does not recognize the device for some reason. For example, you have em_probe() or lem_probe() for e1000 devices. You may add a print statement there to see whether it is called or not. Note that device probe is a functionality related to the PCI/PCIe bus, irrespective of netmap. Have you tried to remove "dev netmap" from the kernel config (for a clean 11.3)? This will confirm that the problem is still there irrespective of ne= tmap being included or not. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=