From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 16 07:49:00 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 438331065673 for ; Tue, 16 Dec 2008 07:49:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pyunyh@gmail.com) Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com (rv-out-0506.google.com [209.85.198.227]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 027B28FC14 for ; Tue, 16 Dec 2008 07:48:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pyunyh@gmail.com) Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id b25so3566863rvf.43 for ; Mon, 15 Dec 2008 23:48:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:received:received:date:from :to:cc:subject:message-id:reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=XNpmrIAv3diOIXtYogNkIH+DSFKf25PjIeBiw05uOdY=; b=C+TQc5Z60JakvTh1zceOFr8ql104rhV3fHbOj445LEic3AQJ6XlAhcO0i/fpR79+A8 ncVIYTSv0quj4/yk6/xTixAkv6EiASQHvc5Y0qfatFjSwv+jMNPrpHtpkhsW8wzhZXQm OEDiqCTnuE2wCrPWWwuvd9D+8SjgmXHUqMUiQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=rPrCk8/aRU7G3KGIWKd7Z8lbtmf///YI85s5x/bf49/94AJXRLnG9fkkels86vqHu9 P2UFbsJEOdQDf1qiP0dQi34NuNmPZOI5h8u5Tm3/t4nwIyANBP3Iaa8CtKmK1cFCYWZ+ /R9UVLHdJHpQ9noDfQDYxaEXiZmCJUivFFl9U= Received: by 10.140.136.6 with SMTP id j6mr4192535rvd.126.1229413739716; Mon, 15 Dec 2008 23:48:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from michelle.cdnetworks.co.kr ([211.53.35.84]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b8sm221167rvf.3.2008.12.15.23.48.56 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 15 Dec 2008 23:48:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from michelle.cdnetworks.co.kr (localhost.cdnetworks.co.kr [127.0.0.1]) by michelle.cdnetworks.co.kr (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id mBG7mqeD064164 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 16 Dec 2008 16:48:52 +0900 (KST) (envelope-from pyunyh@gmail.com) Received: (from yongari@localhost) by michelle.cdnetworks.co.kr (8.13.5/8.13.5/Submit) id mBG7mq8e064163; Tue, 16 Dec 2008 16:48:52 +0900 (KST) (envelope-from pyunyh@gmail.com) Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 16:48:51 +0900 From: Pyun YongHyeon To: Victor Balada Diaz Message-ID: <20081216074851.GD62771@cdnetworks.co.kr> References: <20081210102800.GH37837@cdnetworks.co.kr> <20081210113225.GD1320@alf.bsdes.net> <20081210120719.GK37837@cdnetworks.co.kr> <20081211075707.GH1320@alf.bsdes.net> <20081211081045.GJ1320@alf.bsdes.net> <20081211090056.GH42370@cdnetworks.co.kr> <20081211095021.GL1320@alf.bsdes.net> <20081212121309.GM1320@alf.bsdes.net> <20081215090207.GN1320@alf.bsdes.net> <20081216071919.GR1320@alf.bsdes.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20081216071919.GR1320@alf.bsdes.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [ATA] and re(4) stability issues X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: pyunyh@gmail.com List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 07:49:00 -0000 On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 08:19:19AM +0100, Victor Balada Diaz wrote: > On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 10:02:07AM +0100, Victor Balada Diaz wrote: > > Stopped stress testing this morning. After all the weekend testing > > seems the re(4) problems were fixed. No single interface up/down error. > > netstat -i reports no errors and everything is fine. Thanks a lot! > > > > I'm going to deploy the patches on our production machines. > > > > I've been able to trigger interrupt storms with ATA code, though. > > After deploying it in various machines this night i've found in the > logs messages like this one: > > re0: watchdog timeout (missed Tx interrupts) -- recovering > > I know you told me this is harmless, so this is just so you Yes, it's not real watchdog timeout as long as re(4) still works correctly. > know it's happening. > Ok. I'll update re(4) when I find spare time. -- Regards, Pyun YongHyeon