From owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 5 10:54:57 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B38116A4CE for ; Fri, 5 Mar 2004 10:54:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from haldjas.folklore.ee (Haldjas.folklore.ee [193.40.6.121]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D30F43D1D for ; Fri, 5 Mar 2004 10:54:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from narvi@haldjas.folklore.ee) Received: from haldjas.folklore.ee (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by haldjas.folklore.ee (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i25IseUA033918; Fri, 5 Mar 2004 20:54:40 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from narvi@haldjas.folklore.ee) Received: from localhost (narvi@localhost)i25Isegf033915; Fri, 5 Mar 2004 20:54:40 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from narvi@haldjas.folklore.ee) Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2004 20:54:40 +0200 (EET) From: Narvi To: Johnson David In-Reply-To: <200403051009.20729.DavidJohnson@Siemens.com> Message-ID: <20040305205357.Q38020@haldjas.folklore.ee> References: <200403050615.55106.dgw@liwest.at> <200403051009.20729.DavidJohnson@Siemens.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=8.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on haldjas.folklore.ee cc: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Most wanted X-BeenThere: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD Evangelism List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2004 18:54:57 -0000 On Fri, 5 Mar 2004, Johnson David wrote: > On Thursday 04 March 2004 10:15 pm, Daniela wrote: > > > I'm not speaking of your average code, I'm speaking of high-speed > > assembly language programs. > > Looking back on this thread, I confirmed my memory that it was somewhat > on topic with the applications that keep people from dumping Windows. > When I look around at what people are using on Windows here at work, I > don't see any high-speed requirements. Intead I see Word, PowerPoint, > Outlook, etc. These don't need the incremental speed increase that hand > coded assembly gives you. And any replacement will be in the 'millions of lines of code' depertment and completely infeasible in asm. > > David >