From owner-freebsd-questions  Mon Feb 12 19:16:33 1996
Return-Path: owner-questions
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id TAA26373
          for questions-outgoing; Mon, 12 Feb 1996 19:16:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from phaeton.artisoft.com (phaeton.Artisoft.COM [198.17.250.211])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id TAA26364
          for <questions@FreeBSD.ORG>; Mon, 12 Feb 1996 19:16:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from terry@localhost) by phaeton.artisoft.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id UAA21992; Mon, 12 Feb 1996 20:12:40 -0700
From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>
Message-Id: <199602130312.UAA21992@phaeton.artisoft.com>
Subject: Re: getusershell(3) return unknown shell?
To: eng30219@leonis.nus.sg (Gong Wei)
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 1996 20:12:39 -0700 (MST)
Cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG
In-Reply-To: <Pine.OSF.3.91.960213092222.15791A-100000@leonis.nus.sg> from "Gong Wei" at Feb 13, 96 09:29:33 am
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk

> Is it possible for me to modifiy some source file so that getusershell(3) 
> can recognize bash as a standard shell?  I prefer to working with bash, 
> and lots of things require a standard shell to be returned by 
> getusershell(3), like ftp, for instance.  

Data file.

/etc/shells


					Terry Lambert
					terry@lambert.org
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.