Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2018 13:26:35 -0600 From: Mike Karels <mike@karels.net> To: "Rodney W. Grimes" <freebsd-rwg@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net> Cc: Ryan Stone <rysto32@gmail.com>, freebsd-net <freebsd-net@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Review: Fix regression that did not allow "route change" that didn't re-specify the gateway Message-ID: <201802101926.w1AJQZcZ008010@mail.karels.net> In-Reply-To: Your message of Sat, 10 Feb 2018 08:33:26 -0800. <201802101633.w1AGXRSY035991@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > A change a while back (r264986) broke the ability to change a route's > > parameters if the gateway wasn't explicitly specified again. For > Was the a feature by accident or design? As the man page does not > say that "gateway" is optional on a change command, it shows it > as a required parameter. I can confirm that the feature was by design, and it has been that way for a long time. The man page wasn't sufficiently clear about the difference between "change" and "add" (or, for that matter, "get", which does not require the gateway either, for obvious reasons). I'll take a look at the review. Mike
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201802101926.w1AJQZcZ008010>