From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 16 00:13:20 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 610381065695 for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2010 00:13:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ade@FreeBSD.org) Received: from panix.lovett.com (panix.lovett.com [166.84.7.128]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 393978FC22 for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2010 00:13:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from cpe-66-68-128-204.austin.res.rr.com ([66.68.128.204] helo=[172.16.32.150]) by panix.lovett.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.72 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Ow26I-0001ri-94; Thu, 16 Sep 2010 00:13:18 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Ade Lovett In-Reply-To: <3C14D56E-F631-4E84-8D38-1092FC8C861A@mac.com> Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2010 19:13:01 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <4502DA34-12D4-4F61-A13B-D9807637BD23@FreeBSD.org> References: <18672476.67591284594229837.JavaMail.defaultUser@defaultHost> <3C14D56E-F631-4E84-8D38-1092FC8C861A@mac.com> To: Chuck Swiger X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081) Cc: autotools@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports Ports Subject: Re: devel/autotools267 and UPDATING X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2010 00:13:20 -0000 > On Sep 15, 2010, at 4:43 PM, Barbara wrote: >> About my previous mail, shouldn't the upgrade be handled by the entry = in=20 >> MOVED? Is it a portupgrade problem? >> Is the rebuild of ports like xmms or libX11 really necessary after a = new=20 >> version of autoconf? With "sweeping" ports such as autotools, the consensus is to bump = PORTREVISIONs on affected dependent ports, even if they are build = dependencies only. We've tried in the past to get creative in what does = and doesn't get bumped, and it always generates more problems than it = solves. On Sep 15, 2010, at 18:48 , Chuck Swiger wrote: > It looks like maybe a repocopy is going on (or has gone wrong), since = it is pointing to autoconf-2.62: You need to update your ports tree. Makefile is revision 1.77, not 1.75 = as you have shown. -aDe