Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1999 11:49:11 +0900 (KST) From: junker@jazz.snu.ac.kr To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: ports/9448: port fix: korean/hanterm Message-ID: <199901120249.LAA05209@punky.snu.ac.kr>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Number: 9448
>Category: ports
>Synopsis: port fix: korean/hanterm
>Confidential: no
>Severity: non-critical
>Priority: medium
>Responsible: freebsd-ports
>State: open
>Quarter:
>Keywords:
>Date-Required:
>Class: change-request
>Submitter-Id: current-users
>Arrival-Date: Mon Jan 11 19:00:00 PST 1999
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator: CHOI Junho
>Release: FreeBSD 2.2.8-STABLE i386
>Organization:
NARAE, CS Dept., Seoul National Univ., ROK
>Environment:
FreeBSD punky.snu.ac.kr 2.2.8-STABLE FreeBSD 2.2.8-STABLE #0: Mon Dec 14 12:08:34 KST 1998 pwd@punky.snu.ac.kr:/allegro/2.2-src/sys/compile/PUNKY i386
FreeBSD samba.snu.ac.kr 3.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 3.0-CURRENT #4: Thu Dec 3 10:00:45 KST 1998 pwd@samba.snu.ac.kr:/usr/src/sys/compile/SAMBA i386
>Description:
Recently I received a patch of ELF building of
korean/hanterm-xf86. I've tested it with a 3.0-CURRENT(post
3.0-RELEASE, ELF) machine and send-pr'ed it(and now committed).
So I look at korean/hanterm again(original Unicode-support and
multiplatform variant of hanterm) again, it is marked as BROKEN_ELF too.
But, I can't find any hint that why this ports is marked as
BROKEN_ELF. It can be built as usual, running, and installed.
I've read the ELF section of porting guide in handbook, but I couldn't
find useful information. Why korean/hanterm marked as BROKEN_ELF?
In the log of ports/korean/hanterm/Makefile, the reason is as follows:
Mark BROKEN for ELF:
checking for XextCreateExtension in -lXext... yes
checking for XawSimpleMenuAddGlobalActions in -lXaw... no
checking for XawSimpleMenuAddGlobalActions in -lXaw_s... no
configure: error: Unable to successfully link Athena library
(-lcf_x_athena) with test program
*** Error code 1
It is not true, as korean/hanterm is not a 'autoconf' application, but
a 'imake' application! I think that it's a mistake in confusing
korean/hanterm and korean/hanterm-xf86, because the BROKEN_ELF reason
of two package is just same. Case of korean/hanterm-xf86 is right, but
the other is not. Maybe who marked it didn't look at this in detail.
And this patch has fontpath(as a dependency) fix.
>How-To-Repeat:
Build korean/hanterm as a fresh recent system.
>Fix:
Apply the following diffs:
--- korean/hanterm/Makefile~ Tue Jan 12 11:42:19 1999
+++ korean/hanterm/Makefile Tue Jan 12 11:42:34 1999
@@ -15,9 +15,7 @@
MAINTAINER= junker@jazz.snu.ac.kr
-BROKEN_ELF= yes
-
-RUN_DEPENDS= ${PREFIX}/lib/X11/fonts/misc/johabm16.pcf.gz:${PORTSDIR}/korean/johabfonts
+RUN_DEPENDS= ${PREFIX}/lib/X11/fonts/local/johabm16.pcf.gz:${PORTSDIR}/korean/johabfonts
USE_IMAKE= yes
NO_INSTALL_MANPAGES= yes
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted:
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199901120249.LAA05209>