From owner-freebsd-ports  Sat Nov  2 21:16:45 1996
Return-Path: owner-ports
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id VAA23803
          for ports-outgoing; Sat, 2 Nov 1996 21:16:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from relay.nuxi.com (nuxi.cs.ucdavis.edu [128.120.56.38])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id VAA23798
          for <ports@freebsd.org>; Sat, 2 Nov 1996 21:16:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from obrien@localhost) by relay.nuxi.com (8.7.5/8.6.12) id VAA27586; Sat, 2 Nov 1996 21:17:01 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <199611030517.VAA27586@relay.nuxi.com>
Date: Sat, 2 Nov 1996 21:17:00 -0800
From: obrien@NUXI.com (David E. O'Brien)
To: ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Compressed or uncompressed man pages in PLIST?
References: <96Nov2.174517pst.177476@crevenia.parc.xerox.com>
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.48.1-PL0
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-PGP-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3  90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A
X-Pgp-Keyid: 34F9F9D5
In-Reply-To: <96Nov2.174517pst.177476@crevenia.parc.xerox.com>; from Bill Fenner on Nov 2, 1996 17:45:12 -0800
Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Bill Fenner writes:
> 
>   Should I put the name of the compressed or the uncompressed man pages in
> the PLIST?

Compressed.

It is assumed most people will take the default setting of having their
manpages compressed.

-- 
-- David    (obrien@cs.ucdavis.edu)