From owner-freebsd-emulation Wed Feb 3 20:11:05 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id UAA06657 for freebsd-emulation-outgoing; Wed, 3 Feb 1999 20:11:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from bachue.usc.unal.edu.co (bachue.usc.unal.edu.co [168.176.3.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id UAA06652 for ; Wed, 3 Feb 1999 20:11:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from pfgiffun@bachue.usc.unal.edu.co) Received: from giffunip ([168.176.3.54]) by bachue.usc.unal.edu.co (Netscape Messaging Server 3.0) with SMTP id AAA7110; Wed, 3 Feb 1999 23:13:56 +0500 Comments: Authenticated sender is From: "Pedro Fernando Giffuni" To: Mike Smith Date: Wed, 3 Feb 1999 23:11:49 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Subject: Re: Linux collections (was: Linux devel doesn't work with glibc CC: emulation@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: <199902040002.QAA09939@dingo.cdrom.com> References: Your message of "Thu, 04 Feb 1999 00:24:22 +0100." <36B8DAA6.B5BF232E@scc.nl> X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v2.52) Message-ID: <19990203181329.AAA7110@giffunip> Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > > > > > - Download and install the current RedHat RPM binaries. > > > > I prefer the RPM port for the following reasons: > > 1. It is easier. > > Not notably. > FWIW, all the limitations of the native RPM port you mention are solvable. I think it's a matter of taste, but I don't agree that we should carry a complete Linux system in the ports tree: I consider this bloat. In fact we should symlink the linux shell to our native bash port. My 0.02 $ Pedro. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message