From owner-freebsd-current Tue Dec 17 03:36:48 1996 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id DAA16932 for current-outgoing; Tue, 17 Dec 1996 03:36:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from jalopeno.nixu.fi (jalopeno.nixu.fi [194.197.118.20]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id DAA16927 for ; Tue, 17 Dec 1996 03:36:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from flauta.nixu.fi (flauta.nixu.fi [194.197.118.35]) by jalopeno.nixu.fi (8.8.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id NAA18609; Tue, 17 Dec 1996 13:35:22 +0200 (EET) Date: Tue, 17 Dec 1996 13:35:15 +0200 (EET) From: Marko Lamminen Reply-To: Marko Lamminen Subject: Re: IP masquerading (for a LAN, _not_ PPP) To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <14831.850785273@time.cdrom.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > We really should bring this into -current at some point, now that > we've branched. C'mon, there must be someone out there in -current > land who's a) into networking, b) on the committers list and c) wants > to see this go in. ;) > I would also like to see this included, shouldn't be too hard since it has patches required to run in as lkm already and with minor (?) modifications might be integrated to -current quite easily. But using divert sockets? I don't know how much work this would be but I think I'll take a look at it anyway, once I find some time. Has anyone tested ip_filter, I'm mostly interested how does it perform against ipfw? - Marko