Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 09 Aug 2000 13:28:59 -0400
From:      Nathan Vidican <webmaster@wmptl.com>
To:        Michael Lucas <mwlucas@blackhelicopters.org>
Cc:        hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: SMBFS
Message-ID:  <399194DB.47DCA8CD@wmptl.com>
References:  <200008091608.MAA45997@blackhelicopters.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Michael Lucas wrote:
> 
> My understanding of SMBFS is that it's not intended to be a server.
> 
> It's a pretty solid client, though.  I use it extensively, without trouble.
> 
> ==ml
> 
> > What's the current status the native smbfs support? Can it act as a both a
> > client and a server? How does it compare to Samba in terms of functionality?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Brandon
> >
> >
> > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> > with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
> >
> 
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

How did you implement SMBFS? Is it yet a part of FreeBSD 4.1-STABLE or?
New kernel option?


-- 
Nathan Vidican
webmaster@wmptl.com
Windsor Match Plate & Tool Ltd.
http://www.wmptl.com/


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?399194DB.47DCA8CD>