From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 19 18:41:32 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D78EF966 for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 18:41:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cpghost@cordula.ws) Received: from mail-ie0-f182.google.com (mail-ie0-f182.google.com [209.85.223.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95A068FC12 for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 18:41:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ie0-f182.google.com with SMTP id s9so920203iec.13 for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 10:41:31 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=FNudWmukxGS4iaYcu1HvKpVT+KC6wQ6yKZW7vERPljw=; b=GGefq7mujWAwpJprhthz2Nb+MYFPIkZY9AF4ncBTHTCSSNZvsG3ANDNLRUAY9duiVW W9aW2RNnqNk6EqddoEHFJtQj7t8RW7he1MU/yfekw5Y47cqbyQtYDZA7DIBzj5J1O9Jb 60d9Rv5zSOvsaEErJG0+PPa7u6ykbk0avLRKwvZ8eoXLhadQT7qdYXb/aGzEV+9fwpCA bDWExg0JeAZsh4iVHRWg3eBH+s0TiIQtSjU1c1HKqw/41kMpRonfLTUaR2uq1MSXx0+0 B6qWcDuwpx2eRsbfdL/bP7SArYbKZi24kyeBsWwwZy5RaXIkZD9MUmzH1OYHMZCWq9Ui 1iXQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.220.166 with SMTP id px6mr7451320igc.8.1353350491541; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 10:41:31 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.64.49.67 with HTTP; Mon, 19 Nov 2012 10:41:31 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [93.221.171.204] In-Reply-To: <86ehjpil1i.fsf@universe.org> References: <50A7F53D.7070408@dreamchaser.org> <50A9823F.9070703@bananmonarki.se> <50aa3bd8.YBUNwRI62fWVDOC2%perryh@pluto.rain.com> <86r4npixji.fsf@universe.org> <86ehjpil1i.fsf@universe.org> Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 19:41:31 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: wine-fbsd64 -- no longer in ports From: "C. P. Ghost" To: Hexing Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnuAuk3kTShWIA18+zUpztyuxQcJytsCgwy8nTjSKthUyPlX75RszTTeIuzVMe1ZwLfZlh2 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 18:41:32 -0000 On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 6:01 PM, Hexing wrote: > "C. P. Ghost" writes: > >> On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 1:31 PM, Hexing wrote: >>> I guess that just remove it and install /usr/ports/emulators/wine or >>> /usr/ports/emulators/wine-devel would be OK. >> >> Nope, not for amd64: >> >> % grep 'ONLY_FOR_ARCHS' /usr/ports/emulators/wine/Makefile >> ONLY_FOR_ARCHS= i386 >> % grep 'ONLY_FOR_ARCHS' /usr/ports/emulators/wine-devel/Makefile >> ONLY_FOR_ARCHS= i386 >> >> The wine and wine-devel ports won't even compile on amd64. >> >> There was some guy who claims to have managed creating a >> binary _package_ for amd64 somehow, and wo sent periodic >> announcement updates about to this list. I don't know if it was >> legit or not: I never install stuff bypassing ports. But apparently, >> he didn't create a _port_, nor did he modify/enhance the current >> i386-only wine ports. >> >>> The name 'wine-fbsd64' looks strange. You installed it before? and >>> when did you find this name? >> >> -cpghost. > > Oh, I didn't know that and never try to install wine before. Thanks for > your information. Volodymyr has pointed out that this was a port (and not a binary package) that never got committed. As a port, you can examine precisely what it does and it may be worth a try if you feel that it doesn't mess with your installation and doesn't compromise it. I didn't try it, can't say anything at all about it. -cpghost. -- Cordula's Web. http://www.cordula.ws/