From owner-freebsd-current Fri Jun 14 11:06:07 1996 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id LAA03646 for current-outgoing; Fri, 14 Jun 1996 11:06:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from who.cdrom.com (who.cdrom.com [204.216.27.3]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id LAA03637 for ; Fri, 14 Jun 1996 11:06:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rocky.sri.MT.net (rocky.sri.MT.net [204.182.243.10]) by who.cdrom.com (8.6.12/8.6.11) with ESMTP id LAA09845 for ; Fri, 14 Jun 1996 11:06:03 -0700 Received: (from nate@localhost) by rocky.sri.MT.net (8.6.12/8.6.12) id MAA22022; Fri, 14 Jun 1996 12:03:23 -0600 Date: Fri, 14 Jun 1996 12:03:23 -0600 From: Nate Williams Message-Id: <199606141803.MAA22022@rocky.sri.MT.net> To: Matt Thomas Cc: Nate Williams , freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 2.2-960612-SNAP impressions In-Reply-To: <199606141337.NAA14671@whydos.lkg.dec.com> References: <199606141723.LAA21953@rocky.sri.MT.net> <199606141337.NAA14671@whydos.lkg.dec.com> Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > if_zp.c. PCCARD support doesn't exist in -current, and until recently > > didn't work for the if_ep.c (patches were made to the most recent Nomad > > release, but they use if_nep anyway). > > How busy is your network? I'm on a LAN with >40% utilization (peaking > often at >80%) and a great of multicast / broadcast traffic. We refer to > it as the LAN from Hell. It sounds like a similar LAN. The one at the home office isn't that way (Montana), but the one at Menlo Park (I was there yesterday) is horrendous. The SCO boxes go nuts since they log every packet collision, so you have to clear out the logfiles often. Nate