From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 2 15:16:41 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D4CDAA2C; Wed, 2 Apr 2014 15:16:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.tdx.com (mail.tdx.com [62.13.128.18]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A5A0D62; Wed, 2 Apr 2014 15:16:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from Mail-PC.tdx.co.uk (storm.tdx.co.uk [62.13.130.251]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.tdx.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/) with ESMTP id s32FGeQC099913 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 2 Apr 2014 16:16:40 +0100 (BST) Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2014 16:16:39 +0100 From: Karl Pielorz To: Ian Lepore Subject: Re: Stuck CLOSED sockets / sshd / zombies... Message-ID: <5AF977E21700940D62541596@Mail-PC.tdx.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <1396449673.81853.264.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> References: <3FE645E9723756F22EF901AE@Mail-PC.tdx.co.uk> <1396449673.81853.264.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Win32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2014 15:16:41 -0000 --On 02 April 2014 08:41 -0600 Ian Lepore wrote: > That may imply that adding "UsePrivilegeSeparation no" could be a > workaround for anyone having severe problems with this on a production > server, but it should in no way become mythology that doing this somehow > "fixes" a problem -- it would be purely a workaround, and we should keep > pursuing the actual problem. Thanks for the reply, I'll see if I can setup another system (same source/kernel etc.) - but with that option set, and see if that does indeed workaround the issue. I'll leave the original system 'as-is' to run any further troubleshooting stuff against it. -Karl